Bad faith
Insurance bad faith: when a claim is handled unfairly
The difference between a claim you disagree with and one handled in bad faith, how the rules change from state to state, and what to do before you talk to a lawyer.
By Valoroath Editorial Team Updated 8 min read
In plain terms
Bad faith is a legal claim that an insurer broke its duty to deal fairly with a policyholder, for example by unreasonably withholding payment on a covered claim or by refusing a reasonable settlement that would have protected its insured. It is not the same as a denial or a low offer you disagree with. Whether you have a claim, who can bring it, and what it can recover depend on your state's law: some states treat bad faith as a tort created by the courts, others by statute, and some both. If you think it applies, keep a complete record and talk to a licensed attorney in your state. No outcome is assured.
- What it is
- A legal claim
- Depends on
- Your state's law
- Two kinds
- First-party, third-party
- Who to ask
- A licensed attorney
Bad faith vs. a claim you disagree with
Insurers and policyholders disagree all the time about what a car is worth or whether an exclusion applies. An honest disagreement, even one the insurer loses, is usually not bad faith. Bad faith is about how the claim was handled: whether the insurer acted unreasonably, without a proper basis, or put its own interests ahead of its policyholder's.
The NAIC's model Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act, which most states have adopted in some form, gives a sense of the conduct regulators treat as unfair:
- Misrepresenting what the policy says or covers.
- Not acting reasonably promptly on claims, or not confirming or denying coverage within a reasonable time.
- Refusing to pay without a reasonable investigation.
- Not trying in good faith to settle once liability is reasonably clear.
- Forcing people to sue by offering substantially less than they ultimately recover.
Those rules are enforced by the state insurance department. Whether breaking them also lets you sue depends on your state.
In practice, the question tends to come up when a pattern shows in the file: the insurer asks again and again for documents you already sent, denies a claim without looking at the evidence, gives no reason for a decision, misstates what the policy says, or lets deadlines pass with no word. One of those on its own may be a mistake that a letter or a supervisor can fix. Several together, on a large claim, are the kind of facts a lawyer will want to see.
First-party and third-party bad faith
First-party bad faith
Your own insurer mishandles your claim under your policy, such as collision, comprehensive, uninsured motorist or PIP. The California Supreme Court held in Gruenberg v. Aetna (1973) that when an insurer unreasonably and in bad faith withholds payment of its insured's claim, it can be liable in tort.
Third-party bad faith
Someone sues or claims against you, and your liability insurer mishandles the defense or settlement. In Crisci v. Security Insurance (1967), California asked whether a prudent insurer without policy limits would have accepted the settlement offer.
The third-party duty matters most when a claim against you is worth more than your liability limits. If your insurer turns down a reasonable chance to settle within the limits and a court later awards more, the gap could fall on you, and some states let you hold the insurer responsible for it.
If you are sued after a crash, send the papers to your insurer right away, check the duties section of your policy, and keep copies of any settlement offer the other side makes within your limits. Those dates and figures are the core of a third-party bad faith question later.
If you are the one claiming against another driver's insurer, the duty described above generally runs to that insurer's customer, not to you. Whether a third-party claimant can sue the other driver's insurer directly is a question of state law. Your usual routes are the claim against the driver, your own coverage, and a complaint; see first-party vs. third-party claims.
Court-made or written in a statute
States split on where bad faith comes from. In some, courts recognize it as a tort, as California did. In others, the legislature wrote it into a statute with its own procedure and remedies. Some states have both. These examples come from our state pages:
| State | Rule | What it can add |
|---|---|---|
| Washington | Insurance Fair Conduct Act, RCW 48.30.015: a first-party claimant unreasonably denied coverage or benefits can sue; 20 days' written notice to the insurer and the commissioner first | Actual damages; the court may raise them up to three times and must award attorney's fees when the denial was unreasonable |
| Texas | Insurance Code Chapter 542 for late first-party payments; Chapter 541 lets a policyholder harmed by listed unfair claim practices, such as not trying in good faith to settle when liability is reasonably clear, sue after written notice at least 61 days before filing | Chapter 542: interest and reasonable attorney's fees. Chapter 541: actual damages, court costs and attorney's fees, and up to three times actual damages if the insurer acted knowingly |
| Maryland | Insurance Article §27-1001: a first-party case generally starts as a complaint to the Insurance Administration, which decides within 90 days | Reasonable attorney's fees, capped at one-third of actual damages |
| South Carolina | §38-59-40: refusal to pay a covered claim within 90 days of your demand, without reasonable cause or in bad faith | Attorney's fees, up to one-third of the judgment |
| Virginia | §38.2-209: a court finds the insurer denied coverage or refused to pay in bad faith | Costs and reasonable attorney's fees |
Each rule has its own conditions, deadlines and notice steps, and courts read them closely. That is why the right first step is a lawyer licensed in your state, not a general article.
Records that matter
Whether a claim was handled in bad faith is decided from the record. Start keeping one now, even if you hope never to need it:
- Keep every letter and email to and from the insurer, with dates, including the denial and any offer.
- Keep a call log: date, name, what was said and what was promised.
- Keep proof of what you sent and when: the proof of loss, estimates, photos, medical records, receipts.
- Note the deadlines in your state's rule and whether the insurer met them.
- Ask in writing for the reason behind each decision and the policy language it relies on.
Talking to a lawyer
Bad faith law is specialized, and the answer turns on your state, your policy and your facts. Look for an attorney licensed in the state whose law applies who handles insurance disputes. Bring the record above, your full policy, and a one-page timeline. Ask how fees work before you agree to anything, and what the attorney thinks the realistic range of outcomes is, including none.
Valoroath is not a law firm, does not give legal advice, and does not refer readers to attorneys. Nothing here means you have a claim or will recover anything. If your dispute is really about a slow file rather than an unfair one, our page on claims that drag on covers the written steps that often get it moving.
Questions people ask
What is insurance bad faith?
A legal claim that an insurer broke its duty to deal fairly with its policyholder, for example by unreasonably withholding payment on a covered claim or refusing a reasonable settlement within limits. Whether it applies depends on your state's law.
Is a denied claim or a low offer bad faith?
Not by itself. An honest disagreement about coverage or value is usually not bad faith. The question is whether the insurer acted unreasonably or without a proper basis, which depends on the facts and your state's law.
What is the difference between first-party and third-party bad faith?
First-party bad faith involves your own insurer's handling of your claim under your policy. Third-party bad faith involves your liability insurer's handling of a claim someone makes against you, such as refusing a reasonable settlement within your limits.
Do I need a lawyer for a bad faith claim?
It is a legal claim with state-specific rules, deadlines and notice steps, so talk to an attorney licensed in your state before relying on it. Valoroath does not recommend or refer lawyers.
Sources on record
- NAIC — Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act (MDL-900)
- Supreme Court of California — Gruenberg v. Aetna Insurance Co., 9 Cal. 3d 566 (1973), via Justia
- Supreme Court of California — Crisci v. Security Insurance Co., 66 Cal. 2d 425 (1967), via Justia
- RCW 48.30.015 — Insurance Fair Conduct Act
- Texas Insurance Code, Chapter 542 — Prompt Payment of Claims
- Texas Insurance Code, Chapter 541 — Unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices
- Texas Insurance Code §§541.060, 541.151, 541.152 and 541.154 (2025 Texas Statutes, via Justia)
- Maryland Code, Insurance §27-1001 — First-party claims and good faith
- S.C. Code Title 38, Chapter 59 — Claims practices (§38-59-40)
- Va. Code § 38.2-209 — Award of insured's attorney fees in certain cases
Facts on this page were checked against these sources on November 11, 2026. This page explains general rules and is not legal advice; state law and court decisions change.
Ask a licensed agent to review your coverage
After a claim, the policy you had is the one you can still change. Describe your situation and Valoroath passes it to licensed insurance agents and insurers who can review your coverage and quote, if you want them to. Valoroath itself does not sell insurance or handle claims.
- 1 Five questions about your car, your record and your policy.
- 2 Who to ask for, and your consent to be contacted.
- 3 A licensed insurance agent or insurer reviews what you have. You change nothing unless you choose to.
Sending this request shares your answers and contact details with the licensed insurance agents and insurers who receive it, which some state privacy laws treat as a sale; see your privacy choices. An agent reviews your coverage; they can't take on your claim or a dispute with your insurer. You pay Valoroath nothing. The licensed insurance agents and insurers who contact you pay Valoroath for requests and set their own prices and terms; your claim stays with your insurer. How we make money.
Next in the file
-
Claim dispute
Complaining to your state
When a complaint helps, how to find your insurance department, what to include, and what it can and can't do.
-
Claim dispute
When your claim is denied
What a denial letter must say, the records to ask for, and your options from cheapest to costliest.
-
State claim rules
Washington
10 business days to acknowledge, 30 days from notice to accept or deny; total loss by formula; 3 years to sue.